It was invented in by Omar Syed, [1] [2] an Indian-American computer engineer trained in artificial intelligence. Syed was inspired by Garry Kasparov's defeat at the hands of the chess computer Deep Blue to design a new game which could be played with a standard chess set, would be difficult for computers to play well, but would have rules simple enough for his then four-year-old son Aamir to understand. Beginning in , the Arimaa community held three annual tournaments: a World Championship humans only , a Computer Championship computers only , and the Arimaa Challenge human vs. After eleven years of human dominance, the challenge was won decisively by the computer Sharp by David Wu. There are six kinds of pieces, ranging from elephant strongest to rabbit weakest.

Author:Shaktishura Tazragore
Language:English (Spanish)
Published (Last):16 March 2007
PDF File Size:20.74 Mb
ePub File Size:13.5 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Arimaa has its own website: arimaa. Also, a book on the strategy of the game has been published I saw it for sale at amazon. The game is designed to be hard to play for computers. Indeed, the inventors offer a So far, the best the computers came was a for the humans in For more on this challenge, see the arimaa website.

Rules The game is played on an eight by eight chess board, that is initially empty. For squares are specially marked with traps : c3, c6, f3 and f6.

Each player has sixteen pieces: an elephant king , a camel queen , two horses rooks , two dogs bishops , two cats knights and eight rabbits pawns. The pieces have the following strengths: the elephant is the strongest, then the camel, then the horse, then the dog, then the cat, and finally the rabbits. The game starts with one player gold, or white making a setup of his pieces on his first two rows. Then the other player silver, or black makes a setup of his pieces on the two first rows at his side.

Any arrangement is allowed in these two rows. The players alternately make a turn, with gold starting to move. In a turn, a player can make four movements. Each movement moves a piece in an' orthogonal direction: sideways, straight forward, or straight backward. It is allowed to move different pieces, or make all four movements with the same piece, and also change directions after each movement. It is allowed to make fewer than four movements, but one must make at least one movement. There is one additional restriction: rabbits cannot move backwards.

One does not take pieces like in usual chess. Instead, pieces are pushed and pulled. A piece can push or pull a piece of the opponent that is weaker, so a dog can only push or pull cats and rabbits.

To push, first move your stronger piece to one of the empty squares that are orthogonally adjacent to the piece of the opponent, and then move your piece to the position of the opponents piece; the opponents piece is pushed in the same direction one square.

To pull, again first move your piece to an empty square incident to the weaker piece of the opponent, then move away from that square, and put the piece of the opponent in the vacated square. A push or a pull takes two movements i. It is allowed to combine pushing and pulling in a turn; however, with one movement, one cannot push and pull simultaneously. A piece that is ortogonally incident to a stronger piece of the opponent is considered to be frozen: it cannot be moved by its owner.

There is an exception: if there is a friendly piece ortogonally incident to it, it is not frozen, and thus can be moved by the owner. Object of the game A player can win by moving a rabbit to the other side of the board, i.

If a turn is ended, and the moving player has a rabbit on the last row he wins. Otherwise, if his opponent has a rabbit on his last row, then the opponent wins. Otherwise, if the opponent lost all his rabbits, the opponent loses. Otherwise, if the player has lost all his rabbits, the player loses.

Otherwise, if the opponent has no possible move or all moves create a repetition of a move for the third time, the opponent loses.

Otherwise, the game continues with the next move. A few details A piece that is on a trap square is removed from the game unless there is a friendly piece ortogonally incident to it. It is possible to move into a trap square while pulling or pushing, and be removed from the game simultaneously. It is illegal to move such that a board position and side to move would occur for a third time; if this is the only possible move, then the player has lost.

Also, a player without any legal moves loses the game. In addition, a player without rabbits loses the game.

Written by Hans Bodlaender. WWW page created: February 13, You can help out by making a small donation or by using this site's affiliate links when you shop at ebay. Like Bombalot, Arimaa is a variant that's very unlike chess, in that there are no matable kings, but it can make use of standard chess equipment. Arimaa might have spread over-the-board better were it not for the licensing requirements for e.

It's perhaps too bad world championship level human Arimaa players finally lost in a challenge series vs. The game can be played on a standard chess board, using four markers for special "trap" squares, with standard chess pieces, but one can also buy commercial sets with the pieces replaced by nice looking animals.

Board game playable with standard chess set, hard for computers. There should be or alternatives per ply, in the same range of choices as arimaa. In Melee for this purpose, special design must limit power of the three long-range pieces, or substitute mid-rangers having the same radials. Would three or four movements per turn, "elevate complexity of [the CV] to a higher level without affecting the theoretical size of the game tree?

Daniil Frolov has the right idea, and his referencing Chess actually has to do with Arimaa. That is, what gives arimaa its 15, or so average alternative moves per turn comes from the plural moving each turn. Just find suitable multi-move CVs from above index, and those CVs arguably present the same difficulty for Computer as arimaa; research can then find which ones actually do.

Approximation of how many moves are available in some sample CVs from multi-move category is instructive. Argument can also develop two other ways: 1 use CVs only from Progressive sub-category; 2 Apply Mutator of requiring up to four moves per turn on any CVs having mostly short-range piece-types, as Frolov is implying in mention at Chess. George Duke wrote on UTC Patent proceedings are supposed to be conducted with the utmost decorum and integrity in any country.

Arimaa does not disclose any material published in Chess Variant Page, yet appears to have drawn on ideas from other CV inventors [each individual responsible for own work]. Moreover, some referenced patent documents would seem to be irrelevant.

It's reasonable over-all to patent this usp as unique, but the novelty is not quite honestly disclosed in the description. Since Arimaa by Variantists' high standards is subpar CV and game anyway, this critique will be intermittently developed. Some AI articles constantly kneejerk referencing Arimaa as landmark drone without rigour, and their authors unschooled in CVs should be embarrassed. Like as just one example, Carrera-Bird-Capablanca-Seirawan BN and RN compounds are periodically returned to as topic, to the extent Arimaa continues to be overplayed in Chess press undeservedly, the critiques will revive and deepen.

This CVPage article says Arimaa was invented around That would indicate Arimaa is invented fall or winter Though not unprecedented Warp Points are unusual in CVs, and they do have functionality related to later Arimaa Traps. Unfortunately Omar Syed has never spoken here about Chessic influences and input, but arimaa sites tell of distress over Deep Blue-Kasparov match prompting new design. Follow-up will look at prior art the patent itself cites. Also to locate are CVs where multiple movements, two or more, in one turn get distributed over two or more p-ts.

Number of ratings: 3 , Average rating: BelowAverage , Number of comments: 9. Advertising Privacy.


Arimaa/Playing The Game

Arimaa has its own website: arimaa. Also, a book on the strategy of the game has been published I saw it for sale at amazon. The game is designed to be hard to play for computers. Indeed, the inventors offer a So far, the best the computers came was a for the humans in


Arimaa Rules

The two players, Gold and Silver, control sixteen pieces each listed in descending order of strength :. The players begin by setting up their pieces however they choose on their home rows. Highlighted are the four trap squares. If Arimaa is played using a chess set, the pieces may be represented by the king , queen , knights , bishops , rooks , and pawns respectively. Unlike their chess counterparts, however, Arimaa pieces move only in cardinal directions , and step one square at a time. Diagonals have no place in the rules of Arimaa.





Related Articles